Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Medical Journal of Malaysia ; 77(Supplement 4):44, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2147681

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Mucosal immunity, including secretory IgA plays a vital role in host defence against respiratory pathogens, including SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, this study aims to analyse salivary IgA in response to the COVID-19 vaccines such as BNT162b2, CoronaVac, and AZD1222 in convalescents (RT-PCR-confirmed COVID-19) and naive subjects (non-infected COVID- 19) before receiving their second dose. Material(s) and Method(s): Saliva was collected in a sterile container, centrifuged and stored at -80 degreeC until analysis. Salivary IgA was detected using an Anti-SARS-CoV-2 ELISA (IgA) kit (Euroimun-Lubeck, Germany). Result(s) and Conclusion(s): The study involved 281 participants, with 145 convalescents and 136 naive subjects. Before receiving the first dose of the COVID-19 vaccine, 81.4%, 15.2%, and 3.4% of the 145 convalescents had positive, negative, and borderline results, respectively. Then, before receiving the second dose, 100% positive results were observed with the salivary IgA ratio median of 4.95, 2.71 and 3.32 among BNT162b2, CoronaVac and AZD1222, respectively. There was evidence of a difference in salivary IgA ratio between BNT162b2, AZD1222 and CoronaVac (p < 0.005). However, there was no evidence of a difference in salivary IgA ratio between CoronaVac and AZD1222. For naive subjects, 95.7%, 30.2% and 83.0% showed positive results before receiving the second dose of BNT162b2, CoronaVac and AZD1222, with the salivary IgA ratio median of 1.63, 0.74 and 1.43, respectively. There was evidence of a difference in saliva IgA ratio between BNT162b2 and CoronaVac as well as AZD1222 and CoronaVac (p < 0.005). However, no significant difference was observed between BNT162b2 and AZD1222. After the first dose of vaccination, the vaccines significantly increased the production of salivary IgA in convalescent compared to naive subjects.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL